Decorative pattern of dots
Decorative pattern of dots

PCER Fund

Key info

Application deadline12 noon, 3 November 2025
Funding availableUp to £6,000 per project
Total fund£60,000

There is currently one application deadline confirmed for the 2025/26 academic year, in Michaelmas term. The PCER team is exploring possibilities of a further deadline in Trinity term 2026 and will provide an update on this if it is confirmed in 2026.   

What is the PCER Fund?

The Public and Community Engagement with Research (PCER) Fund allows researchers and public engagement facilitators to apply for funding to support purposeful and responsible public and community engagement with research activities. 

Who can apply?

Any researcher or public engagement professional at the University of Oxford from any discipline or research area can apply as Principal Investigator (PI). PIs are accountable for the project.

As PI, you can submit applications with co-applicants. Co-applicants may be other staff members (e.g., researchers, DPhil students, teaching staff, public engagement professionals, museum staff) or external partners (e.g. representatives from patient and community groups, teachers, etc).

Both newcomers and those experienced in public engagement with research are encouraged to apply.

Eligibility requirements:

  • A University cost centre is required to host an award. College-based activities are possible, but funds must be managed through a faculty or department.
  • At least one applicant (either the PI or a co-applicant) must be a researcher at the University of Oxford.
  • DPhils are welcome to apply but will need the support of their supervisor/PI. DPhil applicants should ensure that their supervisor/PI supports the project, agrees to hold the budget in the event of funds being awarded, and include their supervisor as a Co-Applicant in the application in IRAMS.
  • There’s a deadline for spending the funds so you’ll need to make sure your project can be completed by 30 June 2026.
  • Your project must be engaging the public and/or communities with your research. Before applying please consider the information in the ‘About the fund’ and ‘Preparing your application’ sections to determine if your project is right for the PCER Fund.

How much funding is available?

As an applicant you can apply for up to £6,000 to support your project. There is a total of £60,000 available for the 2025/2026 academic year.

Funds must be spent before the end of June in the financial year they are received.

What can funds be used for?

All funds requested should be spent on the development, delivery and evaluation of your project and justified in the budget section of your application.

The kinds of costs that can be applied for may include (but are not limited to):

  • Equipment and materials costs
  • Reasonable travel costs in line with the University’s travel policy
  • Venue and catering costs (e.g. for engagement workshops)
  • Recognising and rewarding community contributors for their time and expenses
  • Promoting or advertising engagement opportunities
  • Staff time and/or salaries

Questions?

If you have any questions about the PCER Fund, please contact Faye Shelbourne ([email protected]) in the Public and Community Engagement with Research Team in Research Services.

For support in planning your project and preparing your application, we suggest speaking to the Public Engagement Lead in your division:

What are the aims of the PCER Fund?

The PCER Fund supports researchers to improve their research through public and community engagement activities. We believe that engaged research is better research, because incorporating diverse perspectives improves ideas, makes findings more relevant and maximises the positive differences that research can make to the world. 

The fund plays a key role in the University’s Public and Community Engagement with Research strategy, and its vision for a university where purposeful and responsible engagement with communities and the public is integral to our research, driving collaboration and creating positive change. As well as financial support, the fund provides evaluation support to awardees carrying out engagement activities.

The PCER Fund supports projects from all disciplines, and aims to: 

  • Encourage and support public and community engagement projects that:
    • expand upon established ideas; or
    • experiment with innovative methodologies and novel approaches, and enhance engagement practices; and/or
    • develop external partnerships for future engagement opportunities.
  • Engage a diverse range of people with Oxford’s research, including under-engaged groups, bridging the gap between research and the public and communities.
  • Develop researchers’ skills in public and community engagement with research.
  • Fund projects with the potential to make a difference to members of the public and communities, researchers, and/or their research.

What won't we fund?

Projects that aim to target policy makers or engage business and industry are not eligible for the PCER Fund and should apply to the University’s Knowledge Exchange Seed Fund or one of the OPEN policy engagement funding schemes.

Similarly, projects that aim to reach undergraduate students, or where the primary purpose is to increase student applications to the University are not eligible for the fund.

Previously funded projects

To read about projects who received funding from the PCER Fund in 2024/25 academic year, and earlier years when the fund was the PER Seed Fund, browse our project library here.

Is your project right for this fund?

Please ensure you meet eligibility criteria before making an application (see ‘Overview’ section).

To assess whether your project is right for this fund, it can be helpful to consider the following:

1 - Purpose & Difference

Your project should have a clear purpose that is responding to an identified need within the public and/or community you are working with. This might include building on work that’s already underway, starting something completely new, or even developing a relationship for future engagement work. The project should be clearly related to your research and have clear intended or desired objectives.

Ideally, projects should be mutually beneficial to all involved, including members of the public/ a community, researchers or the research itself.

When you think about the difference(s) your project will make, it may be helpful to consider whether it’s a difference in knowledge/information, skills/capacity, or behaviour/attitudes.

Examples of what difference(s) a project could make to different groups are set out below:

Differences made to the public and community(s)

Type of difference – Knowledge/information

Increase awareness of a research topic or outputs

Type of difference – Skills/capacity

Enable audiences to explore a research topic that is new to them

Type of difference – Behaviour/attitudes

Stimulate new interests or increase self-confidence

Differences made to Researchers

Type of difference – Knowledge/information

Increase awareness of common public attitudes towards their research topic

Type of difference – Skills/capacity

Enable researchers to tailor their approach in the context of common public attitudes towards their research topic

Type of difference – Behaviour/attitudes

Increase fulfilment as researchers feel more connected and responsive to public

 2. Methods & audiences

Alongside the purpose of your project and the differences you hope to make, thinking about the types of activities your project will be undertaking and who you will be working with will help you decide if your project is right for this fund.

The fund aims to support projects engaging a diverse range of people, including (but not limited to) groups who may have been under-engaged in the past, through responsible, purposeful methods. These might be new, innovative methodologies or something more tried and tested. The methods you use must be appropriate and relevant to the groups you are working with and the differences you are aiming to make.

Some examples of the kinds of activities you could do to make those differences are:

  • Co-creation of research questions with relevant communities
  • Consultation or interviews with public or community contributors to inform your research
  • Production of a podcast series or animations to share your research
  • Bringing together diverse stakeholders to develop innovative methodologies or tools that address societal challenges

Engagement with research activities

 The Public Engagement ‘onion’ developed by Wellcome is a helpful visualisation of the types of activity that can be defined as public engagement with research. It also represents which activities lend themselves to ‘deeper’ levels of engagement, i.e., where a more rich, two-way interaction can take place; shared decision making at one end and broadcast activities at the other.

Engagement OnionEngagement Onion

You can read a transcript of this image here: The Public Engagement Onion — Mathematical, Physical and Life Sciences Division

Participatory Research

While we fund a whole range of engaged research activities, we also strongly encourage applications from participatory research projects.

Vaughn and Jacquez (2020) developed a helpful definition that offers a starting point for reflection, highlighting that in participatory research, knowledge is co-created in collaboration with those with direct, lived- and living- experience of the topic in focus:

“Participatory research (PR) encompasses research designs, methods, and frameworks that use systematic inquiry in direct collaboration with those affected by an issue being studied for the purpose of action or change. PR engages those who are not necessarily trained in research but belong to or represent the interests of the people who are the focus of the research.” (p.1)

You can read more on our website Participatory Research Oxford

Community Engagement

The term ‘community’ has very different meanings for different people. We understand it as distinct from the general ‘public’. Whilst we welcome applications from projects engaging with the general public, engaging with relevant, more specific communities can increase the potential of your project to make a bigger difference to the groups you are working with.

A community can be any group of people that is connected by place (e.g., a shared geographical location such as people who live in the same town suburb or postcode region), by practice (e.g., a shared profession or activity such as teachers, entrepreneurs), by identity (e.g., gender, ethnicity) and/or experience (e.g. parents, migrants, experience of a particular health condition), or an intersection of more than one of the above (e.g. people in a particular location, with a particular identity who have specific life circumstances). Which community or communities you decide to work with should be influenced by, and in turn influence, your research.

What is distinct about engaging with communities is the purpose and the methods or practices used to do engaged research. Community engagement should be oriented around understanding a community’s needs and improving their circumstances in a co-constructed, non-paternalistic way. As such, community engagement should be built around inclusive, participatory practices and be oriented around consulting and collaborating, rather than informing.

Often, community engaged research can be a catalyst for further activity or social action:

"[Community engagement] often involves partnerships and coalitions that help mobilize resources and influence systems, change relationships among partners, and serve as catalysts for changing policies, programs, and practices."

- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Principles of community engagement (1st ed.). Atlanta (GA): CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement; 1997

What support is available?

When preparing your applicaton, the following resources may be helpful:

For support in planning your project and preparing your application, we suggest speaking to the Public Engagement Lead in your division:

How do I apply?

1. Download and complete the Case for Support template.

2. Save the completed form as a PDF.

3. Use the University’s Internal Research Award Management System (IRAMS) to complete the online form with further details of your project and budget breakdown.

  • Applicants should only fill in budget details in IRAMS for the first financial year (Year 1). More budget lines will appear as you enter budget information.

4. Upload the PDF version of your completed case for support in IRAMS and submit your application by 12 noon, 3 November 2025

Your application will be automatically submitted to your department or faculty. We may contact you during the decision-making process to discuss aspects of your application.   

What are the assessment criteria?

Panels reviewing applications will consider whether a project:

1. Is meeting a need that is important to the groups involved, and is connected to applicant’s broader research (Q3 of application form)

Reviewers will consider questions like:

  • Why is this project needed?
  • Is the project addressing an important issue for the group(s) involved?
  • Is this connected to the applicant’s broader research?

2. Could make a positive difference to the engaged group(s), the research and/or researchers (Q5, 6, 7)

Reviewers will consider questions like:

  • Is the project activity likely to improve the research?
  • Will it make a positive difference for the group(s) involved, like learning new things, getting better at something, or changing how they think or act?
  • Could this project help researchers gain more knowledge or skills?

3. Uses methods that are relevant and appropriate to the difference(s) the project aims to make and the engaged group(s) (Q8, 9)

Reviewers will consider questions like:

  • Do the planned activities seem suitable for the group(s) involved?
  • Is it clear how the activities could lead to the difference(s) the project aims to make?
  • Do activities seem well planned, and achievable in the timeframe?
  • Are engaged groups consulted throughout the project?
  • Does the choice of engaged group(s) make sense to the project's difference(s) the project aims to make?

4. Is engaging responsibly with the group(s) involved (Q8, 9, 10)

Reviewers will consider questions like:

  • Where applicable, does the applicant already know the group(s) involved? Have they talked to them to make sure they support the activity?
  • Will applicants work ethically with group(s)? For example, will they explain what will happen with the information or data given by participants? Are they aware of any risks to participants and handling these carefully?
  • Will the group(s) be paid or rewarded for their time, contributions, and expenses?
  • Are the project activities inclusive and accessible, from recruitment to communication with the group(s)?
  • Does the applicant consider equity and diversity?
  • Does the applicant show respect for the group(s)’ specific context, culture, and power dynamics?

5. Will be able to know if they have made the difference(s) they aim to (Q11)

Reviewers will consider questions like:

  • Do applicants have a plan to find out if they have made the difference(s) they aim to?
  • Will they involve engaged group(s) in any evaluation of the activities and/or difference(s) made?

6. Could make a long-term difference on the engaged group(s) and/or research (Q12)

Reviewers will consider questions like:

  • Could the project have a long-term effect on the engaged group(s)? Is there a plan to stay in touch with them about this work?
  • Are there any materials from the activities, like resources or videos, that can be used in the future?
  • Is there a chance the activities could continue after the funding ends?

7. Is achieving good value for money (Q13)

How are decisions made?

Applications will be assessed against the criteria by members of two separate groups of reviewers:

  • Public & Community (P&C) Panel: community members external to the University who have experience engaging with research (more details about this panel and its activity can be found in the PCER Fund call).
  • Internal reviewers: public engagement experts across the University, including divisional PCER leads, Public Engagement Facilitators and researchers.

Following the review process, applications will be discussed at a recommendations panel meeting. If there are 25 or fewer applications, the panel will recommend specific projects to fund. If there more than 25 applications, the panel will identify projects that it deems to be fundable, and they will be entered into a lottery that will be managed by the PCER team.

What happens next?

We will aim to communicate funding decisions by email five weeks after the application deadline. All applications will receive detailed feedback from our review panels a couple of weeks later.

We aim to share budget codes with successful applicants within 6-8 weeks of announcing funding decisions. However, we cannot guarantee budget code timeframes as this process is not managed by the PCER Team. If there are any delays in getting your budget codes to you and your project is likely to suffer as a result, you may need to speak to your department about underwriting costs.

If you have any questions about this fund, please contact Faye Shelbourne ([email protected]) in the Public and Community Engagement with Research Team in Research Services.

For support in planning your project and preparing your application, we suggest speaking to the Public Engagement Lead in your division: