Oxford University Gazette

Encaenia 2000

Supplement (1) to Gazette No. 4554

Friday, 30 June 2000

|To Gazette No. 4554 (30 June 2000) | To Gazette Home Page |

(i) Speeches made by the Public Orator in introducing the honorands

Degree of Doctor of Civil Law Degree of Doctor of Letters Degree of Doctor of Science (ii) Creweian Oration 2000

University Acts

CONGREGATION 28 June

1 Conferment of Honorary Degrees

THE PUBLIC ORATOR made the following speeches in presenting the recipients of Honorary Degrees at the Encaenia held in the Sheldonian Theatre on Wednesday, 28 June:

Degree of Doctor of Civil Law

Mrs Helen Bamber, OBE

Founder and Director of the Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture

Ad saeculi finem fere pervenimus quo cum maxima hominum multitudo vitam invenerit et beatiorem et liberiorem quam ullo alio quod novimus, tum permulti mortales crudelissimis tormentis, cruciatu inhumanissimo sunt ad mortem usque lacerati. quippe tormentorum usum exolevisse, eculeos ac flagra non iam hominibus terrori fore somniabamus; ecce autem temporibus nostris revertuntur tortores, et quidem novis cruciatus generibus instructi. nam et artifices ingeniosi doctrina sua in hominum perniciem abusi sunt, et ei qui civitates gubernant tyrannidis genus civibus suis inferre iam possunt multo et gravius et praesentius quam aut Phalaris aut Dionysius infligebat. nemo est, certo scio, in hoc hominum humanissimorum coetu quin istius generis flagitia condemnet; sed aliud est domi sedentem misereri, longe aliud saevitiae obsistere, miseris succurrere, suppeditare perfugium curam sanationem. haec quam produco nondum viginti annos nata in locum Tartareum viva descendit:
hinc exaudiri gemitus et saeva sonare
verbera, tum stridor ferri tractaeque catenae
quibus portentis atque etiam peioribus (nam nemo maiorum ea animo fingere audebat quae saeculum nostrum re vera effici vidit) haec non perterrita sed incitata ad captivorum mentes curandas se contulit, quos vix sanari posse sentiebat femina vere humana nisi quisque cruciatus suos narrare et explicare posset. bene enim exploratum habet istius modi vulnera non fomenta tantum verum etiam [sumpatheian] desiderare. et mehercle cui melius narrari possent nefanda ista tormenta tot innocentibus inflicta? nam aures praebet misericordes haec quae scelerum per totum orbem terrarum nefandissimorum testem se praestat indefessam. haec perspexit infantibus aegrotantibus haud minus matrum praesentia opus esse quam medicorum, haec leguleiorum formulis neglectis sesquipedalia scribarum verba saepe perrupit, haec hominum crudelissimo quoque iniuriae genere laborantium et corpora et mentes restituere enititur.

Praesento miserorum praesidium, tyrannorum terrorem, quae opem egenis vocem silentibus spem desperantibus reduxit, Helenam Bamber, Excellentissimo Ordini Imperi Britannici adscriptam, ut admittatur honoris causa ad gradum Doctoris in Iure Civili.

Admission by the Chancellor

Femina quae hominibus aerumnosis misericordiam efficacissimam et verbis et re ipsa adhibere didicisti, ego auctoritate mea et totius Universitatis admitto te ad gradum Doctoris in Iure Civili honoris causa.

Paraphrase

We are at the end of a century in which great numbers of people have come to enjoy more wellbeing and more freedom than has ever been known before. It has also been a time in which very many others have suffered torture and dreadful forms of death. The world had begun to believe that torture was a thing of the past, that the rack and the knout had ceased to menace mankind. That was all too hopeful. In our century we have seen the return of the torturers, armed with torments more exquisite than ever: technicians have turned their skill to evil purposes, and governments are able to impose on their people a tyranny more terrible than anything dreamed of by the worst rulers of the past. I am sure that all of us in this civilised gathering deplore such atrocities. But it is one thing to sympathise while remaining distant and inactive, quite another to make a stand against oppression, to bring comfort to the victims, and to devise care, treatment, and a place of sanctuary. Mrs Helen Bamber was nineteen when she was sent to work in Belsen, a vision of Hell, where there had been, in the words of the poet Virgil,
The sound of shrieks and groans and of the lash,
Grating of iron doors and dragging chains.
All this, and worse—the utmost imagination of previous ages could not come up to the horrors which our times have witnessed in reality—so far from daunting her, served as a stimulus to work with the damaged minds of the survivors of such atrocities. She realised that a vital part of the healing process was telling their experiences: injuries of that kind were not to be cured by physical treatment alone but needed to receive sympathy, and there could be no one better than Mrs Bamber to listen to such stories of the sufferings of the innocent. She has a most sympathetic ear, and she has borne tireless witness to reports of atrocities all over the world. She it was who realised that children in hospital needed the company of their mothers as much as they needed medical treatment. She has repeatedly succeeded in breaking through legal complexities and bureaucratic red tape. Her work has been to bring health to the minds and bodies of those who have undergone the extremes of suffering and ill-treatment.

I present Mrs Helen Bamber, OBE, the defender of the helpless, the dread of tyrannical governments, the bringer of aid to the needy, of voice to the silent, and of hope to those in despair, for admission to the honorary degree of Doctor of Civil Law.

Admission by the Chancellor

Bearer of pity to those in the depths of misery, you have known how to make your sympathy effective both in speech and action. Acting on my own authority and on that of the University as a whole, I admit you to the honorary degree of Doctor of Civil Law.

Return to List of Contents of the supplement


Degree of Doctor of Letters

Dame Judi Dench, DBE

Actress

Non nisi perraro Oratori contingit ut Reginam praesentet; quem igitur ad modum Oratorem adfectum iri existimatis, qui Cancellario et Academiae duas simul praesentare conetur? sed hanc quam produco bis vidimus diademate regio ornatam, nunc Elizabetham nunc Victoriam tam lepide tamque ad persuadendum apte repraesentantem ut ipsas illas reginas, nobis a prima infantia cognitissimas, intueri videremur. neque mehercle huic tantum regno reginisque Britannicis vacavit, quippe quae et Cleopatram, reginam Aegyptiam populique Romani terrorem, et Titaniam, numinum silvestrium imperatricem, ita spectantibus proposuerit ut nihil in illa luxuriae, nihil in hac elegantiae venustatisque desideraretur. sed vehementer errat, si quis hanc sibi fingit semper regiam, semper augustam. nam cum hoc praeteream, partes eam sustinuisse olim omnium primas cochleae, tamen in Gulielmi illius Quatipili Henrico Quinto personam sibi lenae versutae imposuit Dominae si dis placet Properae, inter illas autem quae cum tyranno Italo potione pomeridiana fruebantur Arabellae, pingendi artificis benevolae sed eiusdem incomptae, quam tam luculente repraesentavit ut nemo Anglus non aviam consobrinamve suam agnosceret. tempore autem praetereunte familiaris facta est focis nostris, quam totiens spectavimus ita matrisfamilias partes in usitatis vitae cotidianae vicibus agentem ut possit cum poeta satyrico dicere Quidquid agunt homines, votum timor ira voluptas, gaudia discursus, id artis meae farrago est. quid enim est aliud speculum quoddam vitae opponere quam sic et tragoediae et comoediae praeclarissimum quodque opus ad vivum posse depingere? nemo enim est quin noverit vetus illud adagium, vitam humanam Democrito comoediam visam esse, Heraclito tragoediam; quanto his sapientibus est haec iudicanda esse prudentior, quae utramque tam scite temperet atque moderetur! neque minus stylo usa quam cothurnis excellit, quae de Cycno Avonensi libellum baronum scilicet et fatuorum in usum, qua est verecundia, conscripsit; et ipsa histrionum gregem dirigit, ipsa docet optime fabulas.

Praesento scaenae decus, spectantium delicias, et risus et lacrimarum magistram perfectissimam, Iuditham Dench, Excellentissimi Ordinis Imperi Britannici Dominam Commendatricem, ut admittatur honoris causa ad gradum Doctoris in Litteris.

Admission by the Chancellor

Mimarum praeclarissima, quae artem tuam tanta subtilitate exerces ut nos libenter decipiamur, decepti autem veritatis aliquid humanitatisque discamus, ego auctoritate mea et totius Universitatis admitto te ad gradum Doctoris in Litteris honoris causa.

Paraphrase

An Orator very seldom has the chance to present a Queen for a degree, and so it is bound to be especially delightful when he can present to the Encaenia gathering two Queens at once. We have seen Dame Judi Dench as Queen Elizabeth and as Queen Victoria, both of whom she portrayed with such skill that we thought we were seeing those monarchs themselves, familiar as they are to us all from our earliest childhood. Nor has she limited herself to British royalty. She has appeared as Cleopatra, the Queen of Egypt and the terror of Rome, and as Titania, the Queen of the fairies: the former all sensuality, the latter all grace. But it would be a great mistake to suppose that she is always regal. I shall not dwell on the fact that her very first appearance before an audience was as a snail; but in Shakespeare's Henry the Fifth she was the bawd Mistress Quickly, while in Tea with Mussolini she acted Arabella, a well-meaning but eccentric painter, whom she portrayed so vividly that every Englishman recognised an aunt or a cousin of his own. `As time goes by' she has become a familiar figure in our homes, living through the experiences of a married woman in ordinary life. She might claim, with the poet Juvenal:
My art embraces people's hopes and fears,
Their whole routine, its laughter and its tears.
This is what we mean by holding up a mirror to life: the ability to bring to vivid reality the greatest works, whether of a light or of a serious cast. There is a familiar saying, that life was a comedy to Democritus, a tragedy to Heraclitus; they were philosophers, but Dame Judi shows a truer wisdom, in her ability to manage both so well. She shows no less skill as an author, having written a book which, with her usual modesty, she called Shakespeare for Dummies; and she also is an experienced and successful director.

I present an ornament of the stage, a favourite of the public, equally powerful in evoking tears and laughter, Dame Judi Dench, DBE, for admission to the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters.

Admission by the Chancellor

Great practitioner of the histrionic art, you have practised your skill with such mastery that we love to be deceived, and in that deception gain true understanding about life and the art of living. Acting on my own authority and on that of the University as a whole, I admit you to the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters.

Return to List of Contents of the supplement


Sir Howard Hodgkin, CBE

Painter

Tertio fere quoque anno contingit ut inter honorandos possimus numerare pictorem, quae res nescio an huic solatium adferat, qui civibus nostratibus artem pingendi et difficilem esse adfirmarit et periculosam: Nescio equidem, inquit, an pictoribus Britannis fato eveniat ut spem fallat eventus. quam sententiam ipse manifesto redarguit, cum et domi et foris merito sit amplissima laude cumulatus. produco enim pingendi artificem egregium, qui ita naturam ipsam meditatur ut rerum formas animo digerat commutet obscuret, colores autem et nitidissimos et pulcherrimos tam sollerti manu disponit ut Turnerum ipsum ante oculos habuisse videatur; et quidem cum praemio tanti artificis nomine nuncupato honoratus est, Turnerum alterum sine controversia salutavimus. tabulis suis saepe talia imponit nomina qualia bonae sub regno Victoriae saepe pictores: alteri enim subscribitur Ave, Sinus Neapolitane; alteri autem Viro Forti Puellam Formosam. quid accuratius tempora illa redolere videtur quam haec verba tabulae subscribere, Vera Esse Non Possunt? quin etiam Zelotypiam depinxit. sed vehementer errat, si quis a b hoc certas illas figuras, fabellas illas aniles, infantium mentibus accommodatas, exspectat. cum pictore rem habemus hoc saeculo nato, qui penicillo suo audacter usus imagines fingit coloribus splendidas, pulchritudine insignes (liceat enim mihi hoc nomine virum ingeniosissimum laudare, quamvis ipse aliquando pigere se dixerit), sed quibus hominum formae insunt quodam modo obscuratae, sensus autem arcanus, quem primo intuitu vix dispicere, diutius considerando sensim intelligere possis. homines quos depingit aliquid habent subobscurum: quid nuper evenerit, qua animi perturbatione sint affecti, quaerimus ipsa difficultate delectati. a nobis hic minime est alienus, qui et in Collegio Aenei Nasi hospes acceptus artis suae aemulos instruxerit, et Musei nostri amicus sit beneficentissimus, qui cum tabulas suas tum minutas Indicas quarum aestimator est subtilissimus populo proponendas accommodarit. neque quemquam reppereritis qui elephantos, bestias paene divinas, oculo acriore, animo propensiore diligit.

Praesento temporum nostrorum Apellem, coloris magistrum incomparabilem, Academiae amicum benevolentissimum, Howard Hodgkin, Equitem Auratum, Excellentissimi Ordinis Imperi Britannici Commendatorem, ut admittatur honoris causa ad gradum Doctoris in Litteris.

Admission by the Chancellor

Artifex praeclarissime, qui tot luculentis operibus exquisitam voluptatem hominibus venustioribus dedisti, ego auctoritate mea et totius Universitatis admitto te ad gradum Doctoris in Litteris honoris causa.

Paraphrase

It happens every three years or so that we can count a painter among our honorands. That statistic will perhaps bring a little comfort to Sir Howard Hodgkin, who has said that `to be a painter in England is special, more difficult, more traumatic, and probably more fraught with the absolute certainty of failure than in any other country'. He is himself a considerable argument against that view, having received both here and abroad so many distinguished marks of the success that he well deserves. He is a great painter, who reflects on the forms of nature and subjects them to a process of digestion, transformation, and disguise. His mastery of colour recalls no less a predecessor than Turner; and when he won the Turner Prize, it was an uncontroversial recognition of a worthy successor. He often gives his paintings the sort of titles that suggest the practice of the Victorian period: Goodbye to the Bay of Naples, or None but the Brave Deserves the Fair. Could anything sound more like the style of those days than calling a picture It can't be True? He has also painted Jealousy. But it would be quite out of place to look in his work for the unambiguous figures and the straightforward stories, suitable for the simplest souls, which delighted people in those days. He is definitely a modern artist. He paints pictures which are rich in colour and very beautiful to look at. I hope I may mention that, although Sir Howard has been heard to complain `How irritating it is to be constantly told tha t my pictures are beautiful'. In them the figures are as it were veiled, and the meaning of his work is not obvious at a first glance but goes on revealing itself, the longer you look. His people have something mysterious about them, and we are tempted to enjoy the puzzle of wondering what has been happening, and what are their emotional relationships. He is no stranger to Oxford: as artist in residence at Brasenose College he gave a lot of help to aspiring painters, and he is a friend and benefactor of the Ashmolean Museum, to which he has lent for exhibition both his own works and his distinguished collection of Indian miniatures, on which he is an expert. There is nobody who has a higher esteem or a keener eye for that god-like animal, the elephant.

I present the Apelles of our day, an incomparable master of colour, and a generous friend of the University, Sir Howard Hodgkin, CBE, for admission to the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters.

Admission by the Chancellor

Artist of great quality, your admirable work has given the keenest pleasure to those with discriminating tastes. Acting on my own authority and on that of the University as a whole, I admit you to the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters.

Return to List of Contents of the supplement


The Viscount Runciman, CBE, FBA

Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge

Philosophorum deus Plato, quem senem hic luculenter explicavit, adeo vitam sapientis beatam, adeo negotiatoris mercatorisve existimat esse miserandam, ut in republica sua vim aliquam adhibitam velit sapientibus, qua impulsi delicata illa oti contemplationisque delectatione pro tempore saltem repudiata in cavernam istam regressi, inter nos autem versati, vitae cotidianae negotia gubernent: salutem enim nullam fore nisi aut philosophi regnent aut reges philosophentur. libentissime igitur hunc excipiat quem produco, qui cum sit in sapientibus si quis alius numerandus tamen iamdudum praeclaro negotiatorum collegio praesidet; grato autem animo accipimus, his praesertim temporibus, quod hic Minime credo, inquit, mercatores summos hominibus academicis semper esse prudentiores. in scientia civili quaestiones sibi tractandas eligit spinosissimas, qui rogaverit qua fiat ut cum persaepe alii aliis plus possideant pecuniae dignitatis facultatum, tum aliquando summi ordines invidia careant, aliquando tenuiores dolore et querimoniis inflammentur. miram autem esse iure dixeritis patientiam pauperum, quibus maioris momenti sit quid exspectent quam quid sustineant. quas quaestiones hic acutissime dividit, iustam aequamque rei publicae descriptionem excogitare conatur. in civitatibus aestimandis quattuor res et observandas esse existimat et accurate distinguendas: primum qualis sit vivendi ratio, tum quare exstiterit; has quaestiones scilicet scientiae civili proprias esse; tum quale sit ita vivere ut apud istam civitatem vivitur, qua de re poetas quoque fabularumque scriptores esse audiendos; utrum denique bona an mala ista ratio aestimanda esse videatur. quae quaestio ut ab eis discrepat de quibus disputant physici, tum nihilo minus via et ratione solvi potest. hoc enim in quavis civitate esse bonum ac salubre censere debemus, si civium felicitati consulitur. neque patriae suae commodo defuit, qui cum decemviris praeerat quibus propositum erat cavere ne innocentes damnarentur, libellum protulit consiliis saluberrimis refertum, cui acceptum referimus quod civium iura hodie melius proteguntur, iudicia purius exercentur.

Praesento virum in scientia civili praeclarissimum, in vita publica eminentissimum, in utraque pariter admirabilem, Gualterum Garrison Vicecomitem Runciman de Doxford, Excellentissimi Ordinis Imperi Britannici Commendatorem, Academiae Britannicae Sodalem, ut admittatur honoris causa ad gradum Doctoris in Litteris.

Admission by the Chancellor

De civitatum iure atque indole disputator acerrime, civitatis nostrae decus ac columen, ego auctoritate mea et totius Universitatis admitto te ad gradum Doctoris in Litteris honoris causa.

Paraphrase

The great philosopher Plato, on whose later thought our next honorand has written an illuminating book, had such a high view of the life of study, and such a low one of the life of business, that in his ideal Republic he wanted his philosophic rulers to be subject to a form of compulsion, to force them to go down from time to time into the Cave, as he called it, to mingle with the rest of us, and to direct the affairs of everyday life. The only chance of salvation, he thought, was for philosophers to become kings, or kings to become philosophers. How delighted he would be with Lord Runciman, who while he certainly is a philosopher, has for years also been the head of an important business. We are indeed grateful, in the modern climate, to hear that he has said, `I am aware that the chairmen of companies are not always wiser than university professors'. He has tackled some very difficult problems in political philosophy, asking for instance how it is that, while inequalities of income and status occur so regularly, sometimes the upper groups do not attract resentment, while at others their position is felt by the poor as a grievance. One may well be surprised by the patience of the poor, for whom dissatisfaction seems to be created less by their immediate experiences than by their expectations. Lord Runciman analyses such questions with great acuteness, in the search for a theory of social justice. In judging a society he distinguishes four questions to be asked: What is the case? How did it come about? These are questions that belong to social science. What is it like to live in it? Here we need to call in the aid of novelists and artists. Is it to be judged to be good or bad? That question is different from those which are discussed by physical scientists, but it is still capable of being answered in a methodically proper way: in any society we must judge as good and healthy the maximising of wellbeing. Lord Runciman has served the community, too: he was the Chairman of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, whose Report has led to improvements in the protection of civil rights and the management of the courts.

I present a distinguished social scientist, an eminent public servant, equally admirable in both capacities, Viscount Runciman of Doxford, CBE, FBA, for admission to the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters.

Admission by the Chancellor

Penetrating analyst of the nature of society in general, you are also an outstanding contributor to our own public life. Acting on my own authority and on that of the University as a whole, I admit you to the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters.

Return to List of Contents of the supplement


Professor Quentin Skinner, FBA

Regius Professor of Modern History, University of Cambridge

Quid philosopho dignius quam rerum a nostrae aetatis memoria remotarum accuratam cognitionem habere? quid historico magis decorum quam de rebus gestis non doctrinam tantum coacervare sed exquisitius illud ratiocinandi genus adhibere quo viri dialectici sensum profundiorem, coniunctiones abstrusiores intellegere temptant? cum sit difficillimum vel in utrovis scribendi genere ceteris praestare, quotus quisque erit qui in utroque simul possit excellere? sed avem licet raram ante oculos hodie habemus, cum hic quem praesento inter philosophos insignis factus postmodum inter historicos omnium consensu amplissimam laudem consecutus esse videatur. nam ut ipse dixit, magni momenti erit si hinc indicia quibus utuntur historici, hinc acumen illud et subtilitas virorum dialecticorum simul conferri, simul ad controversias bene resolvendas possint admoveri. haud pauci sunt ei qui summum quemque philosophum amplexi, ceteris neglectis, Platonis Aristotelisve scriptis perlectis quid de quaque re senserint aequales quoque eorum videantur sibi invenisse; hic contra adfirmat praeclara illa ingenia omnium pessimum testimonium praebere, si quis hominum aequalium sententias exquirit: contextum igitur quendam contemplandum, auctorum minorum opera exquirenda evolvenda perlegenda esse. sed ne illos patricios quidem philosophos recte intellegi posse, nisi ipsorum mentibus consideratis hoc rogemus, quid sibi tum voluerint, quid adsequi conati sint, cum sententias suas conceptis verbis expresserint. sic fieri ut philosophi, et ei praecipue qui politici dicuntur, de civitatis natura civiumque officiis argumentati, casibus necopinatis ac vitae publicae vicibus impellantur, libri eorum aliud aequalibus, aliud saepe posteris significare videantur. neque hoc virum acutissimum fallit, verborum vim paulatim immutari, quaestiones ipsas de quibus disputent homines academici minime immortales esse: singularum igit ur notionum historias sine summa cautela non posse conscribi. in controversiis hic gravis est, in orationibus facetus, doctrina vero et litteris admirabilis.

Praesento historicum subtilissimum, philosophum eruditissimum, qui plurimis historiae provinciis peragratis ipsi Nicolao Machiavelli haud impar conscripsit elogium, Quentin Skinner, Historiae apud Cantabrigienses Professorem Regium, Academiae Britannicae Sodalem, ut admittatur honoris causa ad gradum Doctoris in Litteris.

Admission by the Chancellor

Annalium conscriptor eminentissime, iudex doctissime, qui cum sis assiduus in legendo, tum in eloquendo es facundissimus, ego auctoritate mea et totius Universitatis admitto te ad gradum Doctoris in Litteris honoris causa.

Paraphrase

What could be worthier of a philosopher than to possess accurate knowledge of events remote from the memory of the present generation? What could be more appropriate to an historian than to apply, not merely a mass of factual erudition, but also that more subtle discourse with which philosophers seek to understand the deeper sense and the less obvious connections? It is hard enough to achieve distinction in either of the two disciplines; the master of both will be a rare bird indeed. But such a bird we now see before us. Professor Skinner first made a distinguished mark as a philosopher, then attained, by common consent, the highest rank among historians. He has said that he attaches importance to the possibility of a dialogue between philosophical discussion and historical evidence, in the solving of controversial points. Many researchers into intellectual history study the works of the great thinkers and imagine that they understand what their contemporaries were thinking; Professor Skinner insists that on the contrary these outstanding figures give the worst possible evidence for the thought of their times. It is the context in which they wrote that needs to be studied, and the works of minor contemporaries must be sought out and read. As for the great thinkers themselves, their thought, too, cannot be understood without careful consideration of their intentions, in the context of the times in which they were working: what were they aiming to achieve? Thus it is that philosophers, and those above all who write on what is called political philosophy, the nature of the state and the obligations of the citizens, are often affected in their thought by unexpected events and the chances of public life; and their writings have one meaning for their contemporaries, but another for posterity. His sharp eye does not fail to observe that the significance of words gradually changes, and even the questions which philosophers discuss are by no means immortal. It follows that to write the history of a concept calls for the greatest caution. He is weighty in argument, but he is a witty lecturer; while his learning and his scholarship are admirable.

I present a most subtle historian and a most learned philosopher, at home in many periods of history, and one who has composed an elogium for Machiavelli which is not unworthy,[1] Quentin Skinner, FBA, Regius Professor of Modern History at the University of Cambridge, for admission to the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters.

[1] Compare the epitaph on Machiavelli's grave: Tanto nomini nullum par elogium—No elogium can be equal to so great a name.

Admission by the Chancellor

Eminent writer of history as well as acute critic of the historical writing of others, as profoundly read as you are eloquent with words: acting on my own authority and on that of the University as a whole, I admit you to the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters.

Return to List of Contents of the supplement


Degree of Doctor of Science

Professor Sir Martin Rees, FRS

Astronomer Royal

Aliud philosophandi initium quam admirationem nullum esse adfirmat princeps philosophorum Aristoteles; admirationis autem causam atavis nostris omnium potentissimam exstitisse cognovimus splendidum illud caeli et praecipue siderum spectaculum. hic igitur quem produco ex ipsis philosophiae penetralibus prodit. audite, quaeso, quae adflatu paene divino instinctus proclamat Cicero: Quo tandem gaudio, inquit, adfici necesse est sapientis animum cum his habitantem pernoctantemque curis! ut cum totius mundi conversiones perspexerit sideraque viderit innumerabilia caelo inhaerentia cum eius ipsius motu congruere certis infixa sedibus. horum nimirum aspectus impulit illos veteres et admonuit ut plura quaererent. sic fatur oratorum dux et signifer; illorum autem temporum homines cum stellarum naturam ac motus intellegere vellent, nondum instrumenta excogitaverant quibus freti plus doctrinae quam ipsa oculorum et ingeni acie possemus adquirere. sed haec prius fuere: hodie et organa inventa sunt in geniosissima quibus oculorum adiuvetur infirmitas, et ipsius ingeni acumine abusi astrologi hodierni adeo provinciis potiti sunt novis et quidem locupletissimis, ut cum poeta maximo Lucretio adfirmare possim:
Vivida vis animi pervicit, et extra
processit longe flammantia moenia mundi.
nec quemquam longius processisse dixeritis quam hunc, qui a prima usque aetate horum quae cernimus astrorum indolem motumque scrutatus, mox ad ea progressus quae videre non possumus et radiorum quorundam subtilissimorum fontes ultimos detexit et caelestium istorum foraminum cum atritatem illustravit, tum vires inauditas ac paene incredibilis adumbravit; tandem ad ipsum rerum universitatis principium reversus, non sidera natalicia sed siderum diem natalem contemplatus, ratiocinatur et quando et quibus modis totius mundi compages ab initio perparvo ad hanc quam admiramur immensitatem sit aucta et amplificata. neque eo contentus quod ipse intellegit, ceteris explicator exstitit eloquentissimus.

Praesento Eudoxum [eudoxoteron], stellarum observatorem oculatissimum, ipsius mundi interpretem et sollertissimum et sagacissimum, Martinum Rees, Equitem Auratum, Astrologum Regium, Societatis Regiae Sodalem, ut admittatur honoris causa ad gradum Doctoris in Scientia.

Admission by the Chancellor

Caeli contemplator ingeniosissime, explicator doctissime, rerum et visibilium et invisibilium magister eruditissime, ego auctoritate mea et totius Universitatis admitto te ad gradum Doctoris in Scientia honoris causa.

Paraphrase

So great a philosopher as Aristotle has informed us that there is no other beginning to philosophy than the sense of wonder; and we know that for our ancestors the most powerful of all sources of wonder was the magnificent spectacle of the stars of heaven. Professor Sir Martin Rees thus comes from the very heart of philosophy. Here is what Cicero, prince of orators, had to say, in a moment of almost divine inspiration: `What delight must be felt by the mind of the student who spends his days and nights with occupations of this kind! He watches the countless stars, fixed to the heaven, as they turn with the rotation of the whole universe, settled in their places and keeping pace with the motion of the sky. It must have been that vision which impelled the men of old to seek yet further.' Of course, when the ancients desired to observe the nature and the movements of the stars, they had not invented the instruments by which we can learn more than can be acquired by unaided eyesight and pure thought. But that was another world, and now we have instruments of extreme subtlety which come to the aid of our weak vision; while modern astronomers have by sheer intellectual power conquered new provinces for their science. I can say with the poet Lucretius:
The living force of mind prevailed and passed
The blazing ramparts of the Universe.
No one has gone further than Sir Martin. From boyhood he has been a watcher of the stars. Soon he moved on to the objects which are not visible to us. He succeeded in identifying the source of radio emissions, and he worked on black holes, with their fantastic and almost unimaginable powers. Latterly he has turned to the beginning of the universe itself, doing research not on people's birth stars but on the birth of the stars themselves; he has been exploring the questions when and how the universe, starting from a tiny beginning, achieved the colossal size which we marvel at today. Not content with doing such work himself, he is also a most effective public spokesman for the subject.

I present an astronomer who has raised the profile of his subject, a lynx-eyed observer of the stars, both ingenious and profound as a guide to the universe, Professor Sir Martin Rees, FRS, Astronomer Royal, for admission to the honorary degree of Doctor of Science.

Admission by the Chancellor

Perceptive observer and eloquent explainer of the heavens, you are a most learned master of phenomena visible and invisible. Acting on my own authority and on that of the University as a whole, I admit you to the honorary degree of Doctor of Science.

Return to List of Contents of the supplement


Professor Janet Rowley

Blum-Riese Distinguished Professor, University of Chicago

Hospitum agmen claudit haec quae olim apud nos in loco discipulae versabatur, hodie redit summis honoribus ornanda. bis enim hanc hospitio accepimus, cum totam fere vitam ad duos praecipue morbos curandos contulerit, utrumque metuendum: leucaemiam dico, qua sanguinis et naturam et colorem videre possitis adeo vitiari ut simulacra ista Maroniana imitentur, scilicet modis pallentia miris, sive cum poeta tragico Aeschylo dicam, [epi de kardian edrame krokobathes stagon]; et carcinoma istud mortiferum, quod ipsius corporis humani compagem sese devorare compellit, quod adeo mortalibus terrori est ut a multis non nisi nuda c littera significetur, adeo calamitosos et cruciat et caedit. haec autem quam produco et olim abstrusa radiorum doctrina hic imbuta est et cum ipsa animadvertisset cellulas quae chromosomata dicuntur vicibus quibusdam adfici materiamque inter se permutare in hominibus qui morbi genere alii alio laborarent, hic iterum artificio studuit quo illae cellulae concidi observarique possent. laborem diuturnum, patientiam paene infinitam impendebat haec, quae oculis intentis minutas tot corpusculorum commutationes contemplabatur; neque deerant qui tam religiosam mentis intentionem tot annos conlatam irridere conarentur: scilicet hanc singulas harenae micas coacervare atque numerare. dura tamen molli, inquit, saxa cavantur aqua, Ovidius poeta, et deditae huius operae acceptum referimus quod iam carcinomatum et naturam et progressum multo melius intelligimus, quae cum hodie cognoverimus ex innata corporis structura oriri, restat ut homines docti istas cellularum migrationes observent describant intellegere conentur. quo fit ut hodie per totum orbem terrarum magna medicorum multitudo huius inventa subsecuta morborum taeterrimorum indolem indaget, haec autem praemiis plurimis adfecta honorificentissimo numismate Americano sit ornata. neque hoc velim praetermittere, hanc vitae exemplar nobis proposuisse multis nominibus imitandum, cum tot honores adepta adhuc sine iactantia perseveret laborare.

Praesento medicam beneficentissimam, quae patientia insigni, diligentia admirabili, ingenio acutissimo intima valetudinis humanae arcana et detexit et detegit, Janet Rowley, a plurimis Academiis Doctorem honoris causa creatam, ut admittatur honoris causa ad gradum Doctoris in Scientia.

Admission by the Chancellor

Aesculapi famula eminentissima, quae tuis egregiis laboribus obscurissima corporum nostrorum secreta tam clara luce inluminavisti, ego auctoritate mea et totius Universitatis admitto te ad gradum Doctoris in Scientia honoris causa.

Paraphrase

The last in order of our honorands is a scientist who spent some time here as a student, and who now returns to receive the University's highest honour. She has in fact lived here twice, while spending the greatest part of her life on the study of two terrible diseases. One is leukaemia, which makes the diseased blood change its colour, reminding us of the dead as described by Virgil, `pale in wondrous wise', or of the expression of the poet Aeschylus: `To my heart there rushes the blood, stained yellow [by fear]'. The other is cancer, which causes the substance of the body to prey upon itself, and which is so dreaded that many people will only refer to it as `the big C'. Janet Rowley studied radiobiology in Oxford; she observed that chromosomes in leukaemia and cancer patients both lost and exchanged genetic material. Returning to Oxford, she worked on chromosome banding, which permitted detailed observation of segments of chromosomes. She devoted infinite patience to the exact observation of these changes in cells, while some critics were sceptical of such detailed work over a period of years, regarding it as simply counting the grains of sand on a beach. But the poet Ovid reminds us that `Water, though soft, can wear hard rocks away'; and it is thanks to her devoted work that we now understand better the nature and progress of cancers, which she has shown to be genetic in origin. It remained to observe and describe those changes in the cells, in the effort to understand them. Today many scientists are at work all over the world, following up her work, and investigating the nature of these dreadful diseases; while Professor Rowley has been honoured with many awards, including the National Medal of Science. It should not fail to be mentioned that she has set a model for others in her style of life, as despite the honours she has received she continues without ostentation to get on with her work.

I present a medical scientist who has benefited the world, and who by extraordinary patience, admirable application, and high intelligence, has revealed, and continues to reveal, some of the most intimate secrets of health, Professor Janet Rowley, the recipient of many honorary doctorates, for admission to the honorary degree of Doctor of Science.

Admission by the Chancellor

Eminent agent of healing, your outstanding work has shone beams of light on the most hidden areas of our physical health. Acting on my own authority and on that of the University as a whole, I admit you to the honorary degree of Doctor of Science.

Return to List of Contents of the supplement


CREWEIAN ORATION 2000

THE PUBLIC ORATOR delivered the following Oration `in commemoration of the Benefactors of the University according to the intention of the Right Honourable Nathaniel, Lord Crewe, Bishop of Durham'.

Honoratissime Domine Cancellarie: But no, the Orator displays again the full range of his talents by speaking not only in Latin but also in English. The original purpose of the Creweian Oration was commemoration of our benefactors; it has also long been the custom to include in it some reference to events of the past year. For many years it was in fact given in Latin.

This year I thought we might begin with Nathaniel, Lord Crewe, Bishop of Durham, whose hard strawberries and harder peaches have been enjoyed over the centuries by the Nomenklatura of the University. The account of him in the DNB, from the pen of Mandell Creighton, Bishop of London and historian of the Papacy, is strikingly unfriendly. Its opening, or throat-clearing, statement is that `the barony conferred upon his father seems to have imbued Nathaniel's mind with a desire for the sweets of royal patronage'. It goes on with the pronouncement that when, as royal commissioner, he dismissed the Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge for refusing to obey a royal command to admit to the degree of MA a person disqualified by the statutes of the University, his action `shows that his sycophancy was boundless'. The scorn of the Bishop of London for his brother of Durham is tempered only by the aside that `a man of such a time-serving spirit was in no way formidable'; and he sweeps on to the conclusion that `Crewe is a remarkable instance of a man whose posthumous munificence has done much to outweigh a discreditable career'. How these Christians love one another! But there is a moral here somewhere. If anyone present has an acquaintance whose career has been discreditable, it is worth reflecting that benefactions to Oxford University can do much to outweigh it.

Now for some more recent incomings and benefactions. The research income of the University last year was £179,000,000. It sounds like a lot; but, of course, it does not compare with the incomes available to the great universities of North America. And, of course, the state persists in its now traditional stinginess, and the grant for next year from HEFCE is again increased by an amount below the rate of inflation. The idea, it seems, is the interesting one---`vibrant' is, I think the term of the moment---that we can compete on the international level without spending as much money as our competitors do; just as, for example, one might very reasonably hope to run a top-level international tennis tournament, attracting all the top international stars, while giving a top prize of £5,000. The reluctance of the state to pay the rate for the job in higher education, either to individuals or to institutions, does not, of course, mean that politicians are inhibited in their criticisms. Criticism of universities, by ancient custom, does not have to be accurate or well informed. That, after all, is our job.

The state, which has lost so many of its toys---to privatisation or to globalisation, to loss of Empire or to membership of multinational bodies---and which therefore plays ever more obsessively with the few that it still possesses, is confident that it could run the nation's universities very differently from the tiresome academic persons who are making such a hash of it at the moment. And in a way one does share its confidence. More complete control by the political establishment no doubt would indeed have the effect of transforming our performance and the value we give for money. We need only look at the contrast between Tate Modern, where those who knew were left alone to get on with it, and the Dome, sticky with the fingerprints of politicians of both parties, to see the kind of difference that we should expect to see.

Meanwhile, our expenses are great. Apart from the costs of teaching and research, the massive and very important Millennium Buildings Project, which both restores old buildings and pays for new ones, will in total cost £150,000,000. It has for instance already put a new roof on Duke Humfrey's Library.

It was especially welcome that last autumn eleven new members were admitted to the Chancellor's Court of Benefactors. The Court is now so firmly established in the heart of the University that it is hard to remember that its inception was so recent. How did we manage without it?

The Bodleian Library is grateful to its old friend the Oxford Historic Buildings Fund for a generous contribution to the Bodleian Old Library Development Project, BOLD for short; to Lincoln PLC for generous support, again, for the Blind Recording Centre; to the Garfield Weston Foundation and the Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation, for partnership funding for the Library's application to the Heritage Lottery Fund for a Visitor Programme: it is good news that this application has received Stage One approval; to Lovells for continuing to help the Law Library stay open longer; to Rosemary Sprague for generous support for the Vaisey Fund; and to the estate of the late Margaret Sowers, of Santa Cruz, for a contribution to the general income of the Library. And, for a donation to support the Science Library, to Dr David Holmes (no relation).

A devoted friend of the Library, and a Distinguished Friend of the University, steps down as Chairman of the Bodleian's Development Board: Mr Jonathan Taylor, formerly Chairman of Booker PLC. In more than ten years of service he has been outstandingly successful in this vitally important post. A retirement dinner was held for him in the dream setting of the Divinity School. A sadder loss still, this time by death, is that of Professor Colin Matthew, for many years (in addition to being Editor of the New DNB) the Chairman of the Friends of the Bodleian. He brought in many gifts and benefactions. We also greet the generous endowment by Mr and Mrs John Griffiths of a studentship in the field of the history of the book before 1625.

The Bate Collection of old instruments, to which the Orator seldom looks in vain, reports the sad news of the death, at the age of ninety, of Philip Bate. The Collection has received this year a magnificent assembly of instruments from the collection of M.Jean Henry, who was moved to make it by his admiration for the role of the Bate Collection in playing and teaching within the University. It includes nine flutes, six flageolets, four violins, and other interesting items, including a banduria, a zither, an epinette de Vosges, and a psaltery. Another remarkable gift is that of a special flute made for a player who had lost the tip of his right index finger, which is designed to be played with the thumb. It may point the way, says the Bate, for other digitally challenged flautists.

Another kind of challenge: the Designated Challenge Fund has given a total of nearly £420,000 to the support of the University's museums. The University Museum has received a grant from the Museum and Galleries Commission, for electronic access to collection data; and another, both to the University Museum and to the Pitt Rivers Museum, from the Heritage Lottery Access Fund, for improving public access to the museums. The Museum has also launched a CD, played by the European Union Baroque Orchestra.

The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, too, has given a generous challenge grant to establish a new lectureship at the Centre for Refugee Studies, and for the Centre's library. That Centre has received a generous grant from the Ford Foundation for a number of valuable projects, including a visiting fellowship and a workshop.

Hans and Maerit Rausing and Joseph and Lisbet Koerner have given a munificent endowment, via the Michael Aris Trust, to endow a University Lecturership in Tibetan and Himalayan Studies. The Michael Aris Trust has also made a generous donation to support for three years a Librarian in Tibetan at the Bodleian.

Sir Martin Wood has given a splendid donation for the new Martin Wood Lecture Theatre, with a complete conference centre, including seminar and exhibition space. An anonymous donor has given a munificent gift for the Oxford Centre for Molecular Sciences, for the library of the Queen's College, for undergraduate scholarships both at the University and at Queen's, and for the Museum of the History of Science.

Large contributions have been received on the various medical fronts from many donors. The Imperial Cancer Research Fund is expanding its research in Oxford and planning further investments of several million pounds. The Medical Research Council has made a very substantial grant to a group in the Sir William Dunn School of Pathology for research into the workings of the immune system; and the BBSRC has made a very significant grant to another group for research into bacterial cell division. In that School a generous donation from an anonymous source has been received for a Chair in Molecular Biology. The Wellcome Trust is giving support which is both important and, I am obliged by Oratorical precedent to add, welcome, to the Oxford Tropical Network, for research into tropical diseases; and it has made a generous grant to a group at the Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine for research into the HIV virus. The James Knott Family Trust is to make a substantial endowment for postgraduate medical scholarships at St Cross College. And the E.P. Abraham Research Fund has made a generous grant to the Chemistry Research Laboratory.

Other benefactions have not been lacking. Mr Jack Friedman has handsomely endowed the annual Mendel Friedman Conference on Yiddish Studies of the European Humanities Research Centre. Mr Francis Finlay has made a substantial gift to Merton for a new building. Mr Philip Wetton has generously endowed the Wetton Chair of Astrophysics. And a very substantial grant has been received from the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council for Astrophysics and for the Gemini Telescope Project.

Ten groups in the University have been awarded grants under the 1999 Joint Research Equipment Initiative: including the purchase of a mass spectrometer for use in the development of a mass spectrometry technique, described as non-destructive, which is a relief, and help with the BEOWULF supercomputer project, which will model the formation of galaxies. Four bids have been successful to the Joint Infrastructure Fund. Five of our colleagues have been successful in getting Leverhulme Major Research Fellowships. Ten research groups in the University won grants under the 1999 Joint Research Equipment Initiative. Like the man says, the joint is jumpin'. Congratulations to them all.

It has been a good year for Institutes. The Environmental Change Unit has advanced to the status of an Institute. An Institute for Particle Physics is to be established with a generous grant from the Leverhulme Trust, to investigate `dark matter'. A new Institute of Orthopaedic Research is to be established, in a fine new building of vaguely Tibetan appearance: as we launch an appeal for Tibetan and Himalayan studies. And an Institute for the Advancement of University Learning will be launched in October.

Not an Institute but a Unit: a Stroke Prevention Unit has been set up in Oxford with money from the MRC and the Stroke Prevention Council (nothing to do with stopping sexual harassment). They are preventing strokes; but in another part of the forest strokes are being actively encouraged. A dream is to become a reality. Yes, the Swimming Pool, a phrase kept permanently set up in type by all Orators of recent decades, is to descend from Plato's ideal sphere and find physical form. Gipsy violins, please! We thank Mr Lief D. Rosenblatt, who has made a munificent benefaction; Mr and Mrs Michael G. McCafferty, who have made a very generous gift via the San Francisco Foundation; the Rhodes Trust, which has given a splendid challenge grant; and Lady Kenny, lately chatelaine of Rhodes House, who nobly led the successful fund-raising team. In fund-raising the crawling must precede the splash; in the pool, of course, it will be the other way round. To keep us in a more metaphorical swim, an electronic archive of more than 20,000 articles on modern affairs has been donated to the University by Oxford Analytica.

Thoroughly modern, indeed; but in sharp contrast, Neolithic bread has been found at Yarnton, 5,000 years old. The railway companies are reported to be keenly interested. At the Institute of Plant Sciences the team of the aptly named Dr Juniper (can this be an accident?) has tracked down the origins of the apple: in the high valleys of the eastern Tien Sha, in the north western part of the Xinjiang province of China. That presumably implies the discovery also of the site of the Garden of Eden. And Dr Stephanie Dalley has identified two skeletons discovered in northern Iraq as those of Hebrew women of royal birth who married the father and the grandfather of Sennacherib. In those days, it appears, `JAP' stood for `Jewish Assyrian Princess': a truly intimidating conception.

Meanwhile, Professor Sykes, Professor of Human Genetics, has proved by a survey of the Y-chromosomes of 250 men of his name that `99 per cent of Mrs Sykeses have been well behaved for the past 700 years'. We always knew that Bill Sikes---of a cadet branch only, of course---was wrong to be so jealous of poor Nancy. But: what vistas open up of posthumous prurience, what bumper numbers of Ye News of Ye World (Medieval edition). But we can only imagine what Chaucer would have given us as the Geneticist's Tale.

Nor is even that all. An Ancient Biomolecules Centre is to be set up in Oxford, to work on the DNA of extinct animals and proto-humans. A team which includes members from Oxford has finally proved that Neanderthal Man was carnivorous, that he was in fact, in their slightly unexpected phrase, `a top carnivore'; `in terms of carnivory they were up with the wolves and hyenas'. As the lady said to the optician, when she asked for glasses and he sat her down to read off a chart of letters of different sizes, I hadn't realised it was a competition. We await demands for access to Oxford for Neanderthals. Putting even that antiquity into perspective, we have had £300,000 from Viridor Waste Management, the Greenbank Trust, and the Museum of Natural History, for a more realistic display of dinosaurs, including a Tyrannosaurus. Some people thought it unkind of the University Gazette to announce this, two weeks ago, with the headline `Dinosaur and dodo collection unveiled', and illustrate it with a photograph of the Vice-Chancellor and the Registrar.

All that gives an almost vulgar look of modernity to the generous research grant received over five years by the Archive for the History of Performances of Greek and Roman Drama. And, to come right up to date, the Ashmolean mounted an exhibition, called `In the Red: a History of Debt, 2000 BC--2000 AD'. It was opened, I see, by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. But that, of course, was in the first half of the year.

It is a pleasure to record that this year again the Botanic Garden has won a gold medal at the Chelsea Flower Show, for an educational exhibit on the reasons why plants produce smells. Among its exhibits was a dragon arum, which attracts flies by imitating the odours of rotting flesh. The Botanic Garden is not just a pretty face, or a delicious aroma. The University has opened a fine new Business and Science Park at Begbroke. And: the Humanities Computing Development Team has been launched, with all sorts of vibrant applications and implications; and, no doubt, duplications and complications, too.

The administration of the University has been reformed and reshaped. I am in a position to reveal that, after agonising debate and much heart-searching, it has been agreed that its new aims include excellence, vibrance, and transparency; unless indeed I am confused, and those are not its aims but its goals, or possibly its mission statement. Some more modern titles seem in order: his Serene Transparency, the Chancellor; his Harassed Transparency, the Vice-Chancellor; their Vibrancies, the Heads of the Academic Divisions... As for excellence, one remembers Groucho Marx, when by some shady deal he had become a head of state and was addressed as `Your Excellency', replying with a jaunty `You're pretty good yourself!' The Heads of the five new Academic Divisions have been named. So have the four Pro-Vice-Chancellors. You know who you are; we know where you live. Greetings, congratulations, and commiserations to you all. It's the first time for us: be gentle with us!

It would seem absurd to ignore, but affected to dilate upon, the renewal of the Vice-Chancellor, from 2001 to 2004, to see through the reforms in the `governance' of the University. That was a setback for Balliol College, which had been able to boast that it produced the Chancellor, the Vice-Chancellor, and the Orator; and, this year, the Senior Proctor, too. Fortunately, Balliol is not the sort of place that boasts. We have always emphasised that. The Vice- Chancellor made a powerful speech at the beginning of the year, full of weighty matter. Connoisseurs of University oratory, if they exist, will detect much overlap with this one. The Recognition of Distinction exercise was abandoned, not without a regretful official statement that it was not achieving its purpose. Well, well, Sir. A new scheme was unveiled, to applause less than unanimous, for allowing University Lecturers and CUFs to compete with each other for small financial increments. There occurred to irreverent minds an image applied by Cyril Connolly to some critical writing about modern poetry, but now more and more replacing the fuddy-duddy image which we used to have of collegiality: jackals snarling round a dried-up well.

The OED is now online. It runs to 60,000,000 words and has 9,000 new entries; its revision cost £35,000,000; it can keep up with `vibrant and colourful varieties of English'. Vibrant, of course; but not (fortunately) transparent, or I suppose there would be no need for a Dictionary. And now accessible online are the works of Robert Grosseteste, the University's first big-headed Chancellor, known to more trendy students of scholasticism as the Vibrant Doctor.

In the Clarendon Laboratory a fine new superconducting magnet has set a world record by generating a continuous field of twenty teslas at the atmospheric boiling point of liquid helium. And I don't need to remind anyone here what that means.

An Oxford scientist is a member of the international team which is trying to conserve the Raratonga and the Tahiti flycatchers. The University is also well represented in the struggle to save the painted hunting dog of Zimbabwe, and in that to rescue the lions of the Kalahari; and, less exotically, but suitably for that underprivileged minority of scientists who get air-sick on long journeys to exotic and expensive places, in the quest to preserve the British water vole.

Interesting lectures were given during the year. On 28 June 1999 Mr Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the UN, came and lectured us on `The Dialogue of Civilisations and the Need for a World Ethic'. He is to receive an honorary degree some time next year.

The Prime Minister gave the Romanes Lecture in Michaelmas Term on `Education and Human Capital in the Next Century'. His message was that education has two points: one is the advancement which a good c.v. brings to the career and the earning power of its fortunate possessor; the other is that education enriches the country economically. In his striking phrase, `Universities are wealth creators in their own right'. So that's all right, then.

Ms Beryl Bainbridge gave the Richard Hillary Memorial Lecture on the theme: `What makes a writer'. Yet again we saw the importance to the artist of an unhappy childhood. Lord Melchett, Director of Greenpeace UK, gave a lecture on `Campaigning for Environmental Solutions'. Mr Rupert Murdoch gave a lecture at University College on his vision of the future. It was refreshing to hear him state his view that increasing choice of media is empowering the consumer to an unprecedented extent, and that the media will be swiftly punished if they `misjudge public taste or morals'. Mr Jeremy Paxman lectured on `Surviving Spin'. In a more innocent day, I suppose, that would have suggested something about cricket.

New this year is the Public Interest Disclosure Act (1999), and the consequent issuing of a code of Academic Integrity in Research. `At last!' we academics murmur gratefully. Misconduct includes `failure to follow an agreed protocol if this failure results in unreasonable risk of harm to humans, other vertebrates or the environment'---a curious list; but it is a comfort to feel that the only invertebrates at risk from my own current researches on Attic Tragedy are a few colleagues in the subject at certain other universities.

There have been some significant comings and goings. The new Rector of Lincoln, in succession to Dr Eric Anderson, who returns from the academic hurly-burly to Elysium, as Provost of Eton (in the phrase of Horace, `adscribi quietis ordinibus deorum'), is to be Professor Paul Langford, Chief Executive of the AHRB.

The new President of Wolfson, in succession to the eminent biologist Sir David Smith, who continues as President of the Linnaean Society, is Sir Gareth Roberts, Vice-Chancellor of Sheffield University and a distinguished scientist, who has in his time served as Chairman of the CVCP and is a member of the Board of HEFCE.

A new President of Corpus succeeds Sir Keith Thomas, a great figure in the writing of history, and a dynamic Chairman of the University Press. He is Sir Tim Lankester, Director of the School of African and Oriental Studies, London University, and formerly Permanent Secretary at the Department for Education. At St John's the new President, in succession to Dr Bill Hayes, scientist, ex-Bursar, and central figure in university finance, is to be a Scholar; in fact, Sir Michael Scholar: who made his career mostly in the Treasury, including tax and public expenditure; and who ended as Permanent Secretary at the Department of Trade and Industry.

One begins to see something like a pattern in some of these appointments. There was a time, thirty years ago, when colleges felt that the most urgent menace was from their own revolting young. As their Heads they elected lawyers and philosophers. Now they see it as coming from the Government and the civil service, and they look to the ranks of those who know, and can presumably handle, that dark and alarming world. Perhaps the BEOWULF supercomputer could come in handy here, too, to deal with the monsters that emerge from the mere.

At St Catherine's a new Master succeeds Lord Plant, whose retirement was announced last year. The new man is Sir Peter Williams, currently Chairman of Oxford Instruments Group PLC; and Chairman of Isis Innovation Ltd.; and of the Trustees of the National Museum of Science and Technology. He is President elect of the Institute of Physics. He works closely with the University and its spin-off companies.

And now we come very close to that rarest of journalistic events, a world scoop for the Creweian Oration, with the news, announced to the world today, that Balliol has pre-elected its Acting Master, Mr Andrew Graham, to succeed in 2001 to Dr Colin Lucas, the Vice-Chancellor, whose merits have just been so signally recognised by the University. Mr Graham is an economist and, we note without all that much surprise, a former adviser to the Government.

We turn to honours awarded in the year. And here there should surely be a flourish of trumpets before each honoured name; but you must imagine that. You will want me, I am sure, to give special prominence to the fact that in May Sir Roger Penrose, formerly Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics, was appointed to the Order of Merit. It also gives great pleasure that the High Steward, Lord Goff, has been awarded the Grand Cross of the Federal Republic of Germany.

In the two Honours Lists of the year five of us were knighted: the Warden of Nuffield, Dr Anthony Atkinson, for services to economics; Professor Royston Goode, lately Norton Rose Professor of English Law, for services to academic law; Professor Charles Hoare, lately James Martin Professor of Computing, for services to education and computer science; Professor George Radda, Professorial Fellow of Merton, for services to biomedical science; Professor John Rowlinson, lately Dr Lee's Professor of Chemistry, for services to chemistry, chemical engineering, and education. It also gave general pleasure that two of our recent Encaenia honorands received knighthoods; Laurence Whistler, Honorary Fellow of Balliol, was knighted for services to art, and Professor Andrew Wiles, Honorary Fellow of Merton, whom the University honoured last year, was made KBE for services to science. And Mrs Vivien Duffield, Honorary Fellow of Lady Margaret Hall and Member of the Chancellor's Court of Benefactors, was created DBE.

Mr Timothy Garton Ash, fellow of St Antony's, was created CMG. Professor Susan Greenfield, Professor of Pharmacology; Professor Christopher Leaver, Sibthorpian Professor of Plant Sciences; the Reverend John McManners, Fellow and Chaplain of All Souls; Professor Richard McCrory, Fellow of Linacre; Dr Ann McPherson, Fellow of Green College; Professor Patricia Nuttall, Director of the Institute of Virology; and Ms Barbara Stocking, of the Faculty of Clinical Medicine, were created CBE; Dr Gerald Draper, Director of the Childhood Cancer Research Group Office, and Dr Sian Meryl Griffiths, Senior Clinical Lecturer, were created OBE; Dr Rosemary Hails, Lecturer of St Anne's; Miss Sybil Ovenstone, of University College; Mrs Barbara Paxman, of Hertford College; Mr Ronald Watson, custodian at Christ Church; and Professor Colin Webb, Professor of Laser Physics, were created MBE.

Three of our number were elected this year to Fellowships of the Royal Society: Professor James Binney, Professor of Physics; Dr Peter Somogyi, Director of the MRC Anatomical Unit; and Professor John Woodhouse, Professor of Geophysics. Sir Robert May, Royal Society Research Professor of Zoology and currently Chief Scientific Adviser to the Government, is to be the next President of the Royal Society. And this year's George Eastman Visiting Professor, Professor Martin Karplus, was elected a Foreign Member.

The British Academy has elected to Fellowships five of us: Dr Anthony Hunt, Professor Wendy James, Professor Paul Klemperer, Dr Ross McKibbin, and Professor Wilferd Madelung.

Other distinctions follow, in alphabetical order of recipient, as the Orator will not attempt to rank them in order of distinction or eminence. All are distinguished, all are eminent, all (doubtless) are vibrant. I make no claim to be exhaustive: who can list the stars in the Milky Way?

Sir Jack Baldwin, Wayneflete Professor of Chemistry, has been awarded the Leverhulme Medal. Professor Mike Brody, Professor of Information Engineering, has been awarded the Faraday Medal. Professor John Cardy, Professor of Physics, has been awarded the Paul Dirac Medal and Prize. Sir John Elliott, lately Regius Professor of Modern History, has been awarded the Balzan Prize for his contribution to Spanish History. Dr Niall Ferguson has been awarded the Wadsworth Prize for Business History for his book on the Rothschilds. Dr Michael Freeman has won the Yorkshire Post Book of the Year award for his Railways and the Victorian Imagination. Professor Paul Harvey has been appointed Secretary of the Royal Zoological Society. Professor Guy Houlsby has been elected a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering. Sir Peter Morris, Nuffield Professor of Surgery, has been chosen as President of the International Surgical Society. Professor David Pettifor, Isaac Wolfson Professor of Metallurgy, has received the 1999 Award of the Royal Society and Brasiers' Company. Professor Peter Sleight has been awarded the Galen Medal in Therapeutics by the Society of Apothecaries. Dr Andrew Steane has been awarded the Maxwell Medal and Prize. Professor James Woodhouse, Fiat-Serena Professor of Italian, has been awarded the D'Annunzio literary prize. Two of us were awarded silver medals by the Royal Society of Chemistry: Professor Richard Compton and Professor Richard Wayne.

A couple of interesting appointments: Professor John Krebs has become head of the new Food Standards Agency, and Dr Gordon Marshall, of Nuffield, has become Chief Executive of the ESRC.

The Senior Proctor made a departing Oration of especial elegance. He is (as it happens) a pupil of my own. He recorded his conviction that `Yes, these Proctors are quite something after all'; tempering it somewhat with the concluding throwaway remark that the most famous of all Proctors (in Latin, Procurators) was---of course---Pontius Pilate. An original closing sentence seems somehow to have been omitted from the published version; I believe it identified the modern successor of Judas Iscariot. He dwelt on the increasing age of university grandees, Heads of Houses, and members of the new Council of the University. We need to be aware of this. Despite Shakespeare, ripeness is not all.

It is about now that the Orator attempts to remind the company that the University does not consist only of the great, the good, and the grey-haired. There are also the junior members. A few rather random glances, then, into their characteristic activities. First, a couple of swots. Our junior members took three of the six top places in this year's Times Law Awards competition; and Mr Mark Tito, a research student in the Centre for Molecular Sciences, has received the first ever Science Graduate of the Year Award. As for their political life, there were allegations of irregularities in the election of the President of OUSU, and allegations of secrecy and of corruption at the Oxford Union. A typical year, in fact.

This was, to change the focus again, a spectacular year of success in sport. We beat Cambridge in the Boat Race, and in the twenty-eighth Varsity Games, which include Ultimate Frisbee. The Varsity Rugger Match was won, 16- -13, in the last four minutes; and the Rugby League match; the Under-21s and the Greyhounds also won their matches; while the women's match was won 52- -0. The senior University was also victorious in Soccer; and Boxing; and Dancesport; and Darts; and Oxford won the Varsity Baked Bean Eating Competition by the convincing margin of forty beans. A new OU Sports Federation has been launched, as has a new range of `Dark Blue' sporting clothes, fetchingly illustrated on p. 1152 of the Gazette, and billed as `classic yet trendy'. That phrase may yet replace, as our motto, the rather antiquated Dominus Illuminatio Mea. And there has been an exciting Soccer-style transfer: our new Head of the Development Office is Mr Mike Smithson, Development Director of Cambridge. What can it mean?

Plays put on during the year included Antony and Cleopatra and Fred and Madge; and ranged from The Revenger's Tragedy to Pillow Talk, and from Little Shop of Horrors to HMS Pinafore. We could choose between Right Ho, Jeeves, and Class Enemy (unless indeed they are the same play); we could follow She Stoops to Conquer with 'Tis Pity She's a Whore (which does sound disconcertingly like the next step); Tickle Soup rubbed shoulders with Shallow Grave, and Under Milk Wood with Ben Jonson's Sejanus: his Fall, in which the passionate denunciations of informers and their ever growing power in the terrified Rome of Tiberius Caesar reminded an academic audience all too pointedly of the world of the TQA and the RAE.

This year we direct a glance at the world of the undergraduate clubs and societies. As one peruses the list (courtesy of the Proctors' Office), the eye falls on the Alternative Singing Society, a most suggestive name; I suspect that alternative singing is what is sometimes practised on my staircase in the evening; and the Beer Appreciation Society (Secretary and Treasurer, I observe, both members of St Catherine's). There is a Belly Dancing Society--- be still, my beating heart---but no sign of the merger that might produce two great missing organisations: the Beer Belly Dancing Society, and that rarest of tastes, the Beer Belly Appreciation Society. Another tempting merger might be between the Oxford Belles and the Oxford Gargoyles; tempting, at least, for the Gargoyles. More inscrutable are the activities of the Broom Cupboard Society, or of the Babylon 5 Society; opaque also the aims, and indeed the goals, of the Constructive Loonery Organisation Type Society (Senior Member: Dr Washington of Keble), not---of course---to be confused with its bitter rival, the Official Monster Raving Loony Society (Senior Member: Dr Davidson of St Edmund Hall). Neither of their mission statements was available. Let me not fail to mention the Nirvana Appreciation Society. There one might indeed feel at home.

Less amusing was an occupation of the Development Office, to protest against government policy on fees. It struck the trained minds of some of our young people that it if the University was damagingly short of money, then it would be a sensible contribution to paralyse our fund-raising. Among the demands of the occupiers was the charming one `that the University stop taking action against those who cannot (sic) pay their fees... through disagreement with the principle of an ‚litist educational system'. The logic of that cannot is interesting. A court order got them out. Damage done is reported to have cost £30,000. `This was an unwelcome episode' (the Senior Proctor). Hardly more welcome was the custard pie flung, by another vibrant young thinker, into the face of Ms Ann Widdecombe, MP.

Somehow Death always has the last word, and this year as usual the University has not been spared its ravages. John Ruskin died a hundred years ago; the centenary was marked by two exhibitions. This year we mourned the death of Cardinal Basil Hume, formerly of St Benet's Hall. From our own number we lost valued colleagues and loved friends. I record the names of Donald Boalch, Fellow of Corpus Christi; Margery Booth, Fellow of St Anne's; Brian Bower, Fellow of Green College; Vera Daniel, Fellow of St Hugh's; Richard Fargher, Fellow of St Edmund Hall; Don Fowler, Fellow of Jesus; John Hale, Fellow of Jesus; Bernard Halstead, Fellow of St Anne's; Francis Haskell, Fellow of Trinity; Janet Hiddleston, Fellow of St Hilda's; John Michael Hinton, Fellow of Worcester; Peter Levi, Fellow of St Catherine's and sometime Professor of Poetry; John Lloyd, Fellow of Wolfson; Colin Matthew, Fellow of St Hugh's; William McHardy, Member of the Governing Body of Christ Church; Catherine Middleton, Fellow of Mansfield; Harry Pitt, Fellow of Worcester; Richard Popplewell, Fellow of Trinity; Francis Price, Fellow of Keble; Patrick Reilly, Fellow of All Souls; Leighton Reynolds, Fellow of Brasenose; Ronald Robinson, Fellow of Balliol; Geoffrey de Ste Croix, Fellow of New College; Dennis Sciama, Fellow of All Souls; Rachel Trickett, Principal of St Hugh's; Robert Turner, Fellow of Green College; Anne Whiteman, Fellow of Lady Margaret Hall; Vincent Wright, Fellow of Nuffield. Et lux perpetua luceat eis.

Return to List of Contents of the supplement