The Millennium Commission
The National Heritage Lottery Fund
The Arts Council (Arts Lottery Fund)
\The Sports Council (Sports Lottery Fund)
The National Lottery Charities Board
There is now a sixth distributor, NESTAthe National Endowment for Science, Technology, and the Arts. This is not yet in operation.
This guide has been written to help members of the University who may be considering making an application for Lottery funding.
The rules also state that `Projects are ineligible if they have started prior to the submission of an application and a decision of an award being notified. A project start is either the placing of a contract or a start on site. A retrospective application for funding will not succeed.' This has quite important implications for some projects. An urgent restoration cannot be put off to suit the timetable of the NHLF, but must be carried out while there is still something left worth restoring. The Lottery cannot, therefore, be relied upon to provide funding for the most urgent projects.
Individuals cannot apply for Lottery funds except in the case of Millennium Commission bursaries and NESTA projects. Details of these will be obtained by the University Development Office as soon as they are announced.
Applications must demonstrate that they fit within some wider strategy in order to secure funding. Projects must show that they have support both from the University and from outside partners. Any initiative will stand little chance of success if it appears that it was created solely to obtain Lottery money just because it is there.
Each of the Lottery distributors excludes applications which seem eligible for funding from another source so care must be taken to select the most appropriate one when applying.
Return to List of Contents of the supplement
The Millennium Festival is the final element of Millennium Funding, and applications closed at the end of September 1998. This scheme, administered on behalf of the Commission by the New Millennium Experience Company (of Greenwich Dome fame) distributed money from the budgets of the four other original Lottery Distributors for revenue projects in each of the relevant areas.
University schemes should demonstrate that they will benefit a far wider audience than simply the academic users of the institutions.
Applications for capital projects now go through a two-stage process, with an initial eligibility check for larger projects, and a simplified procedure for small grants.
In July 1998 the NHLF established its first revenue project, the Museums and Galleries Access Fund, designed to support those institutions which are trying to improve access (defined in the broadest sense) to their collections.
Before contemplating making any application you should telephone the Fund's Information and Publications team and ask for the relevant brochures. The numbers are: 0171-591 6041/2/3/4.
Return to List of Contents of the supplement
Return to List of Contents of the supplement
Return to List of Contents of the supplement
This is the only distributor that does not impose a matching funds requirement.
Return to List of Contents of the supplement
They intend to launch support schemes in spring of 1999, and it will be some while before NESTA is in a position to make financial commitments as it has yet to build income from its £200m endowment. In addition to this, it is still establishing its financial and administrative systems. It does not yet have a permanent office or full staffing and its Trustees, chaired by Lord Puttnam, still have to consider how support should best be provided.
Details of this programme will be circulated when they become available.
Return to List of Contents of the supplement
Some input (this can be `in kind') by the University must normally be in evidence. Such matching funding or support should not include existing provision, but should relate to the increased activity which would result from Lottery support. In other words, it is unlikely that a Lottery distributor will be impressed by an application which includes an existing salary as the University's matching contribution. If, however, the new activity will result in a change to that member of staff's work, or some kind of increase in activity, a proportion of this salary may be eligible as matching support.
Return to List of Contents of the supplement
Any request for Lottery funding must be submitted for consideration by the University in the same way as any other request for additional resources. Applications will be reviewed in the first instance by the University's Development Programme Management Group. The Group is required to seek the approval of the General Board and Hebdomadal Council through the Resources Committee, which is responsible for considering the effects on the University's financial, staff, and physical resources. This may also include the issue of sites for major applications. It is important to ensure that issues such as duplication of approach and relevance of the project to wider strategic goals of the University are addressed as early as possible.
Potential applicants should consult the secretary of the Resources Committee, Mr P.W. Jones, Deputy Registrar (Administration), on procedures and the expected timetable for consideration of the application by the Committee. Time should be allowed for this in the project's own application timetable.
Any project submitted to the Resources Committee should include a copy of the application form and a covering paper which provides a schedule of capital and recurrent costs. Proposed sources of partnership funding, space requirements, and any site implications should also identified.
It is important to note that where there are several applications likely to be made in the name of the University there could be competition for resources. Therefore applicants must let the Secretary of the Resources Committee know about their proposals as early as possible so that bids can be considered as a group, rather than on a first-come, first-served basis. The Lottery Distributors have also indicated that simultaneous multiple approaches from different parts of the University are more likely to fail. It is not for these bodies to select the University's development priorities.
Return to List of Contents of the supplement
Dr Jill Pellew, Director, the University Development Office, University Offices, Wellington Square (telephone: (2)70222, fax: (2)70225, e-mail: jill.pellew@admin.ox.ac.uk)
Paul Dryden, Development Executive, University Development Office, Oxenford House (telephone: (2)78463, fax: (2)78466, e-mail: paul.dryden@devoff.ox.ac.uk).
Return to List of Contents of the supplement